Archive for March, 2007

Pro-gay, anti-gay marriage?
Homotopia offers radical queer critique of gay nuptials

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Sarah E. Brown ‘09

When: Today, Thur 3.29 (7-9pm)

Where: Students’ Building, Second and Third Floor (UpCDC)

Price: FREE

Shot in the unabashedly gritty style of radical feminist guerilla films of the 1970s, Homotopia challenges traditional discourse surrounding gay marriage, laying bare the myth that all who oppose gay nuptials are necessarily homophobic. The film screening is sponsored by QCVC, ACT OUT and the Vassar Democrats in an effort to spark campus dialogue about the myriad issues surrounding same-sex marriage. Presenting radical feminist and anti-racist challenges to the institution of marriage, the film weaves a love story into a queer utopian narrative that gives voice to a silenced, alternative take on the debate. Only 35-minutes long, this film still packs a punch that raises more questions than it answers—which is exactly what San Francisco, Calif. filmmakers Chris Vargas and Eric Stanley intended. Post-screening, stay for the panel discussion which will include the filmmakers; Evan Casper-Futterman ’07, the first child in New York state to be legally adopted by his mother’s partner; and Vassar professors Bethany Dunn and Ken Robinson, whose respective Philosophy and Film department backgrounds should make for a discussion that’s not to be missed.

Riot Grrls, homocore and beyond: a gay music primer

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Mike Newmark ’08

No one can be blamed for believing that “gay music” doesn’t really exist, or that it ever really existed at all. Modern music is commonly divided along the lines of musical aesthetics, or sonic signifiers that slot bands under a given genre umbrella. Besides the fact that this makes it easy for a consumer to find CDs similar to the ones that he or she likes (“If you like X, try Y!”), it’s also mainly just the most instinctive way to do things: Bush sounds like Local H sounds like Everclear sounds like Live, but instead of separating them based on lyrics or intention, the powers that be went ahead and called it all grunge. Whatever.

Yet gay music was a viable—if not prominent—force within the underground community in the not-so-distant past, united not by a shared sound, per se, but by a shared ideal. In 1985, gay multimedia artists G. B. Jones and Bruce LaBruce laid the groundwork for this ideal with the completion of the indie zine J.D.s (short for Juvenile Delinquents), a scrappy-looking publication that was more well known for what it helped to mobilize than what was actually in it. The J.D.s editors viciously attacked both mainstream straight and gay cultures, especially the latter, which they believed was isolating itself and shunning diversity. In the next few years, other magazines dedicated to the cause would crop up and bands would begin to crystallize, culminating in the J.D.s’ first musical offering in 1990, J.D.s Top Ten Homocore Hit Parade Tape.

The word in that title that knocks people over is “homocore,” of course. Unbelievably, that word was abandoned early after its inception for being too emblematic of M.O.R. homosexuality. The more inclusive “queercore” replaced it, although some of those who are still involved with the movement use the term “homocore” with a sort of nostalgia. Queercore was born during the waning days of the fed-heavy Reagan administration and at the tail end of punk rock’s prime (when the genre began to welcome a number of left-field punk variants), which made the new movement a near-perfect fit for its surrounding milieu.

Queercore bands were fiercely independent and usually experimentally punkish, deviating from the “hard, fast, and short” rule of 1980s hardcore. The sounds of these bands might have been disparate within punk rock (The Apostles flirted with metal and industrial while Bomb was decidedly neo-psychedelic) but all were unified by the goal of expressing themselves—if not to be accepted by the mainstream, then at least to be heard and understood. However, queercore bands still had trouble making inroads into the wider independent music scene (their shows were limited mainly to cities in Canada and along the Pacific Coast), but the punk community and indie record labels such as K Records and Kill Rock Stars were willing to embrace them.

A slightly more successful relative of queercore was “riot grrrl,” a post-punk subtype consisting mostly of females from the Pacific Northwest nearly always dealing with issues of feminism and women’s rights. Led by the uber-charismatic Kathleen Hanna of Bikini Kill, the movement began similarly to queercore—with an influential zine (also called Riot Grrrl, that Hanna helped to create), and a crop of charged, punky bands that followed in its wake.

Some riot grrrl acts were short-lived but incredibly influential (Bikini Kill), while others had careers that stretched well into the 1990s (Scrawl, Sleater-Kinney). The grrrls’ success relative to queercore seemed to have less to do with their sound and more to do with their feminist ideals, which were easier for most people to swallow than out-and-out homosexuality. After all, feminism gained sufficient traction in the 1960s, decades before the gay community had even begun to become visible.

A handful of queercore bands finally broke the ice in the early-to-mid ‘90s, bringing straight listeners face-to-face with the cantankerous movement. The farthest-reaching band in terms of pure popularity was Pansy Division, a pop-punk band whose sound would be instantly familiar to anyone who grew up on Weezer, but whose songs unfalteringly dealt with homosexuality in all its forms, from wishing their old boyfriends well in other relationships to extolling the joys of jizz.

Pansy Division took a slightly different approach than most queercore bands, trading in blunt force for wry humor, but their insistence on revealing their gay lifestyle without trying to proselytize anyone perfectly encapsulated the original queercore manifesto by the J.D.s editors. Ironically, it was Pansy Division’s fluke entry into the mainstream that finally brought the queercore movement the amount of attention it sought when they opened for Green Day on their 1994 tour. As a band, Pansy Division was short of remarkable, but the exponential exposure they precipitated explains why present queercore bands and fans speak of the Bay Area pop-punkers with the reverence usually reserved for rock and roll legends.

Another important gay band was God Is My Co-Pilot, who weren’t the most successful of the queercore lot but doubtlessly the most ambitious. Openly bisexual couple Sharon Topper and Craig Flanagin pulled out all the stops across their 33 (!) records, incorporating noise-rock, free jazz and cowpunk (among other wacky genres) into their fractured pop pastiche, and singing a number of their songs in foreign languages, including (but not limited to) Finnish and Yiddish. God Is My Co-Pilot catapulted queercore into previously unimaginable realms by scaling artistic heights while staying true to the issues of sexuality that the movement sought to address. In retrospect, God Is My Co-Pilot may have been too experimental to be leaders of a movement that wished to exhort an ideal above all else, but they were still a galvanizing force, injecting the genre with a kind of erudition it had previously never seen.

By the late ‘90s, queercore had sunk back to the most underground levels. Queercore shows happen sporadically across the country, publicized—as it was two decades ago—by zines and cassette tapes even in the technological age. Fans lament the passing of their 1990s heroes that brought queercore its too-brief 15 minutes of fame, and continue to fight for the genre even as they know it is doomed to remain below the radar. However, gay music still finds a home in the work of some singer-songwriters (most notably Ani DiFranco), and some listeners are now drawn to the music of queercore notables, hearing it less as a form of social protest and more as a document of a zeitgeist that wasn’t actually so far away. The way most of us admire gay music of the ‘80s and ‘90s is peculiar: we may not put it on our iPods, but it surely deserves praise for its adherence to its ideals of justice, liberation and acceptance. That’s something we can all appreciate.

Fashion by 429 offers outfits for the out-set

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Mathew Kane ’07

Think you’ve got good Gaydar? These days, you don’t really need it.

429, the New York-based t-shirt company does all the work for you. Friends Gregory Lawrance and Luis Fernandez, who go by simply Luis and Greg, started the label out of a “frustration with extremist sexual stereotypes” a few years back, creating near perfect tees for men in pima cotton. The brand’s name (4-2-9 spells out gay on a telephone keypad) is subtly placed on the neck, arms and body of the tee in flirtatious phrases like “429BOY,” “429YOUWISH” and “AREYOU429?”

In a post-Stonewall, postmodern world of sexual ambiguity, 429’s clothing suggests that sexuality need not become a person’s entire identity; however, there is also the fabulous contradiction within 429’s shirts: as an assertion of sexual autonomy and ambiguity, one ends up wearing one’s sexuality on their sleeve. Yet this statement is extremely subtle; in fact, it barely registers at first glance.

Can gimmick like 429’s really last? Perhaps not, but the shirts certainly speak for themselves; Luis and Greg spent over a year perfecting their samples for comfort and durability. Cut close to the body without being constricting or tight, they suggest rather than flaunt one’s shape. And with a tasteful color palette and a variety of styles to choose from, there’s still room self-expression and originality.

Perhaps most importantly, 429 has sponsored numerous events for gay rights groups in New York and around the country, including the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and the Empire State Pride Agenda. So by giving to yourself, you’re really giving back.

429 is available at Camouflage, 141 8th Avenue (212-741-9118) and Odin New York, 199 Lafayette St. (212-475-0666), both in Manhattan.

http://www.429life.com/

WNBA star Sheryl Swoopes speaks on coming out

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Sarah E. Brown ’09

Sleekly dressed and towering over her podium at the University of Pennsylvania’s Harrison Auditorium, Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA) star Sheryl Swoopes appeared Tuesday, March 20th as the keynote speaker of QPenn, a week-long celebration of queer diversity at UPenn.

At six feet tall, muscle-bound Swoopes is a striking embodiment of female power. Despite her intimidating physique, she enraptured the audience with her anecdotes and humorous asides, often revealing a glowing smile that was more charming than fierce.

Swoopes has received numerous awards and honors, including WNBA Most Valuable Player (2000, 2002) and Defensive Player of the Year (2000, 2002, 2003), yet she claimed her most satisfying achievements have taken place off the courts as an advocate for gay rights.

Swoopes had been living a life that seemed idyllic—traveling the world to play professional women’s basketball while also married to a man and the mother of a son. Although she claimed her marriage dissolved for reasons other than her sexual orientation, shortly after filing for divorce in 1999 Swoopes started seeing long-time female friend and WNBA coach Alisa Scott.

Her clandestine partnership with Scott forced her to come to terms with being a lesbian, but Swoopes waited to come out due to concerns about how it would affect her family, friends, son, and WNBA teammates.

“Finally, I realized that I was living for others, and that I had to live my life for me.”

In October 2005, Swoopes could no longer reconcile her double life, and made the decision to come out to the public as a lesbian.

“I woke up and realized I couldn’t lie to the world anymore. It ended up being the best decision I ever made in my life,” said Swoopes.

After discussing whether to tell the press she was gay with various friends and family members whom she had already come out to several years earlier, Swoopes had just one person left to tell about her decision—her mother.

“My mom knew I was gay, but she thought it was a phase. I could sense she was fighting to keep me quiet about it. Finally, she realized I had to [come out] not just for me, but for people struggling to come out everywhere.”

After coming out, Swoopes received tremendous media attention, which she said has generally been positive. She also experienced an outpouring of support from her teammates, the queer community and its allies. Swoopes credited her relatively easy coming out process to the prior outings of lesbian athletes such as tennis legend Martina Navratilova and golf champion Rosie Jones.

“Being a lesbian is not a disease, it’s just who you are. I am grateful to be in a position to affect others in a positive way. I hope that anyone struggling to come out knows that as long as you believe in yourself it’ll all be okay.”